Comments on: Why We Need Friendly AI

By: HECTOR

HECTOR — Thu, 01 Jul 2010 04:57:35 +0000

PillSpot.org. Canadian Health&Care.Special Internet Prices.No prescription online pharmacy.Best quality drugs. Low price drugs. Buy pills online…

Buy:Viagra Soft Tabs.Propecia.Cialis Soft Tabs.VPXL.Cialis Super Active+.Cialis Professional.Super Active ED Pack.Cialis.Zithromax.Soma.Levitra.Viagra Professional.Viagra.Viagra Super Active+.Viagra Super Force.Maxaman.Tramadol….

By: Kylie Batt

Kylie Batt — Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:21:23 +0000

Я думаю, что Вы не правы. Предлагаю это обсудить. Пишите мне в PM, поговорим….

Переводчик A sense of fun, the love of beauty, taking joy in helping others, the ability to be swayed by moral argument, the wish to be better […….

By: Kylie Batt

Kylie Batt — Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:58:23 +0000

Ничего не изменишь….

товаров или оборудования 2 Cовместно с Вами by Eliezer Yudkowsky
There are certain important things that evolution created…..

By: Accelerating Future » Tesla Personal Supercomputer

Accelerating Future » Tesla Personal Supercomputer — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 09:46:09 +0000

[...] prefer if this sort of product weren’t around. To quote this article: Moore’s Law does make it easier to develop AI without understanding what you’re doing, but [...]

By: Frank Adamek

Frank Adamek — Sun, 24 May 2009 05:24:11 +0000

Great work (here and elsewhere), even if highly speculative, you’ve brought about a major change in my own thinking and which risks I’m focusing on. I’ve also yet to hear from anyone else the surprising argument that it would be very bad if humanity is destroyed (referencing your chapter on biases in existential risk, in Global Catastrophic Risks). Surprising in that nobody else seems to think this needs to be said, but I agree that the scope of the potential tragedy is so great it takes a special effort just to try and grasp it. How hard would each of us work if we had even a chance to prevent every casualty of WWII? Some of us may take a laissez-faire outlook to such an opportunity but many I think would not. Would we work a hundred times harder to prevent existential disasters? Most likely impossible, but rationally we should try.

If Gus has yet to get feedback or others are interested, a more in-depth work is available from the Singularity Institute’s site (http://www.singinst.org/upload/artificial-intelligence-risk.pdf). Could be something more recent I’m not aware of though.

By: Gus K.

Gus K. — Fri, 22 May 2009 04:19:14 +0000

Hi Eliezer:
I enjoyed your post and your other work. You deserve credit for discovering that FAI is important, is difficult, and that many simple proposed solutions will likely fail. I’m interested in the solutions that you propose. I’ve read LOGI & Existential Risks (in Bostrom) which describe your ideas in a general manner. Do you have a more rigorous article that describes your proposed FAI solutions in detail? Also, when will you publish an academic book, the FAI eqivalent to Drexler’s Nanosystems, so that people can comment on, criticize, and build on your ideas?
Thank you again for your thoughts.
Gus K.